![]() |
| Donkey Hodie and his windmill Source: http://www.neighborhoodarchive.com/mrn/characters/donkey_hodie/ |
If this one anecdote
is indicative of a larger cultural unfamiliarity with Don Quixote,
what is at stake with this loss? One of our participants is currently
reading Ilan Stavan's Quixote:
The Novel and the World (which we've
blogged about before). Three things struck our participants about
the significance of the novel. First, it introduced the same-sex
literary pair, the hero and the side-kick if you will. This device is
so familiar to me that I've never even considered its origins. I
think of Sherlock and Dr. Watson, Batman and Robin, Frodo and Sam,
Dean and Sam Winchester—though I won't try to distinguish between
hero and side-kick in the latter pair! Second, at least according to
Lionel
Trilling, Don Quixote is a novel about the struggle between
economic classes. This point seems relevant in our current social and
political moment, as the debate over
living wages continues in our political discourse. Third, Don
Quixote was influential on Freud. This last point could be a
discussion unto itself!
The first point we
discussed from the session's readings (chapters 36-43) was
coincidences. One participant saw something in Don Quixote
that often appears in nineteenth century American literature,
especially slave narratives. People are constantly being united in
dramatic (and sometimes unrealistic) ways after being torn apart. The
inn, the center of so many of these reunions, seems to be charmed in
bringing people together. In this week's reading, we have reunited
Don Fernando and Dorotea, Cardenio and Luscinda, the Captive and his
brother the Judge, and as our section ends, we have Doña
Clara and her lover, disguised as a mule-driver, being brought
to the same location. Why is the inn so central in part 1 of Don
Quixote? Might this be a testament to Cervantes' attempts at
writing plays? The inn would provide an easy set for action that
would not need to be changed much. As we all know, balconies and
doors can be very important in plays!
The second major
point we discussed was the relation between the “arms versus
letters” speech and the Captive's story. This speech, spanning two
chapters, was the Knight of the Sorrowful Face's major speaking part
in this section of reading. As a brief aside, our chapter selection
for this meeting was striking in how little Don Quixote (or Sancho
Panza) speaks. When Don Fernando and Luscinda come to the inn, Don
Quixote sleeps through everything! Later, when the Captive is
reunited with his brother, Don Quixote sits back, observing. We
interpreted the “arms versus letters” speech, which defends the
active over the contemplative life, as a prologue to the Captive's
story. Some people felt that as a “prologue,” this device seemed
a bit heavy-handed on Cervantes' part. Perhaps Cervantes seems to be
heavy-handed because the Captive's story speaks to his own
experiences of enslavement. However, the defense of arms over letters
is slightly undercut, it seems, by the noble and generous behavior of
the Judge when he is reunited with his lost brother, the Captive.
Language continues
to intrigue us. One of our participants shared with us Google's ngram
viewer that tracks dthe frequency of words or phrases used in
various bodies of literature across time. This resource might be fun
to look at with Don Quixote.--I did a search for “tilting at
windmills” inEnglish-language literature between 1800 and 2015. In
addition, we shared a good chuckle over one of Cervantes' interesting
(mis)uses of words. Although Edith Grossman normally translates the
silliness of some names and phrases used by Don Quixote, there was
one translation that a participant thought should have been
translated (Yes, we have participants reading the Grossman
translation alongside the Spanish!): Princess Micomicona, Dorotea's
disguise, translates as “big monkey”!

No comments:
Post a Comment